<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Court finds that answers to textbook questions are an infringing derivative work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/court-finds-that-answers-to-textbook-questions-are-an-infringing-derivative-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/court-finds-that-answers-to-textbook-questions-are-an-infringing-derivative-work/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:29:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Answers to Textbook Questions Copyrighted? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/court-finds-that-answers-to-textbook-questions-are-an-infringing-derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-39822</link>
		<dc:creator>Answers to Textbook Questions Copyrighted? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2781#comment-39822</guid>
		<description>[...] 11, 2009 &#183; Leave a Comment  Mike Masnick has a new post disagreeing with a recent court decision that answers to textbook questions were a derivative work. From the post:  This still makes no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 11, 2009 &middot; Leave a Comment  Mike Masnick has a new post disagreeing with a recent court decision that answers to textbook questions were a derivative work. From the post:  This still makes no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 06/11/2009: Great Mandriva 2010.0 Reviews; Thunderbird 3 RC Comes Soon &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/court-finds-that-answers-to-textbook-questions-are-an-infringing-derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-39610</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 06/11/2009: Great Mandriva 2010.0 Reviews; Thunderbird 3 RC Comes Soon &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2781#comment-39610</guid>
		<description>[...] Court finds that answers to textbook questions are an infringing derivative work The Defendant allegedly sold answer to the Plaintiff’s engineering and accounting textbooks questions, via the internet. The answer sets were identical to the Plaintiff’s instructor’s solutions manuals. Uneventful simple case of copyright infringement? Such was not the case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court finds that answers to textbook questions are an infringing derivative work The Defendant allegedly sold answer to the Plaintiff’s engineering and accounting textbooks questions, via the internet. The answer sets were identical to the Plaintiff’s instructor’s solutions manuals. Uneventful simple case of copyright infringement? Such was not the case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/court-finds-that-answers-to-textbook-questions-are-an-infringing-derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-39569</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2781#comment-39569</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait until the students catch wind of this and refuse to answer questions from textbooks without a waiver of liability first.  Of course, it&#039;ll start at the law schools first... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait until the students catch wind of this and refuse to answer questions from textbooks without a waiver of liability first.  Of course, it&#8217;ll start at the law schools first&#8230; <img src='http://www.exclusiverights.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/court-finds-that-answers-to-textbook-questions-are-an-infringing-derivative-work/comment-page-1/#comment-39238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2781#comment-39238</guid>
		<description>interesting that they did not use the fair use defence. I think that this is a classic case of 17 USC 107, the clause specifically state that use &quot;for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.&quot; (under the 4 considerations).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting that they did not use the fair use defence. I think that this is a classic case of 17 USC 107, the clause specifically state that use &#8220;for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.&#8221; (under the 4 considerations).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
