<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copy shop liable for direct infringement from student on-premises copying of course packets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-premises-copying-of-course-packets1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-premises-copying-of-course-packets1/</link>
	<description>A copyright law blog covering litigation, policy and academia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:29:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scholarly Communications @ Duke &#187; Through the copyright looking glass</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-premises-copying-of-course-packets1/comment-page-1/#comment-39083</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholarly Communications @ Duke &#187; Through the copyright looking glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2706#comment-39083</guid>
		<description>[...] There is some excellent analysis of this decision by Peter Hirtle here and by Shourin Sen here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is some excellent analysis of this decision by Peter Hirtle here and by Shourin Sen here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 20/10/2009: Nikto 2.1.0 Released, Parsix GNU/Linux 3.0 Reviewed &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-premises-copying-of-course-packets1/comment-page-1/#comment-38552</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 20/10/2009: Nikto 2.1.0 Released, Parsix GNU/Linux 3.0 Reviewed &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2706#comment-38552</guid>
		<description>[...] Copy shop liable for direct infringement from student on-premises copying of course packets The Eastern District of Michigan issued a decision on Wednesday that is sure to be controversial. A group of publishers brought suit alleging that a copy shop had infringed thirty-three of their works. The copy shop had accepted course packets from professors; ensured that the course packets were in proper form to be copied; given the packets to students upon request; and provided copy machines for the students to copy the packets. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Copy shop liable for direct infringement from student on-premises copying of course packets The Eastern District of Michigan issued a decision on Wednesday that is sure to be controversial. A group of publishers brought suit alleging that a copy shop had infringed thirty-three of their works. The copy shop had accepted course packets from professors; ensured that the course packets were in proper form to be copied; given the packets to students upon request; and provided copy machines for the students to copy the packets. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy Schestowitz (schestowitz) 's status on Tuesday, 20-Oct-09 16:38:43 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-premises-copying-of-course-packets1/comment-page-1/#comment-38547</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy Schestowitz (schestowitz) 's status on Tuesday, 20-Oct-09 16:38:43 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2706#comment-38547</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-pre...       a few seconds ago  from kdemicroblog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-pre.." rel="nofollow">http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-pre..</a>.       a few seconds ago  from kdemicroblog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seizing University Photocopiers &#187; Copyright, Commerce and Culture</title>
		<link>http://www.exclusiverights.net/2009/10/copy-shop-liable-for-direct-infringement-from-student-on-premises-copying-of-course-packets1/comment-page-1/#comment-38521</link>
		<dc:creator>Seizing University Photocopiers &#187; Copyright, Commerce and Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 04:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exclusiverights.net/?p=2706#comment-38521</guid>
		<description>[...] professors to drop off and students to use their machines to copy packets of readings. On his blog &#8220;Exclusive Rights,&#8221; attorney Shourin Sen, hypothesizes that the Court found the shop primarily liable to avoid holding [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] professors to drop off and students to use their machines to copy packets of readings. On his blog &#8220;Exclusive Rights,&#8221; attorney Shourin Sen, hypothesizes that the Court found the shop primarily liable to avoid holding [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
